The National Association for Home Care & Hospice (NAHC) recently published a white paper entitled, Rate Rebasing in Medicare Home Health Services: A Review of the 2014 HHPPS Proposed Rate Rule, which offers home health care providers an in-depth look at how CMS’ proposed rebasing rules will affect them. Below are some excerpts from the white paper:
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (PPACA) requires that Medicare reset or rebase the home health services episode payment rate beginning
in 2014 and phased-in proportionately over a four (4) year period. The legislative mandate provides some direction to Medicare on the factors required to be considered in the calculation of the rebased payment rate.
MedPAC recommended that home health services payment rates be rebased because of significant changes in the nature of the services provided during the
60 episode of care along with what it perceived to be “overpayments” for services evidenced by continuing double-digit Medicare margins in comparison to costs. The average episode of care in the base year used for rate setting involved 37 visits primarily made up of nursing and home health aide services while the current care utilization in an episode is less than 20 visits with few aide services and significantly more therapy visits. From 2001 through 2011, MedPAC’s calculation of margins shows freestanding HHAs with an average ranging from 16-18%
On June 27, 2013, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a proposed rule that sets out the proposed rates for home health services in 2014 along with the methodology used by CMS in calculating such.
While the proposed rule states that the impact on home health services spending would be a reduction of $290 million in
CY 2014, in actuality it is far greater as the proposal, if finalized, would trigger four consecutive years of 3.5% reductions in the primary payment rates, totaling a 14% reduction by 2017. That level of rate cuts is estimated to reduce Medicare home health spending by well in excess of $25 billion over the next ten years.
The proposed rule is open for the submission of written public comments through August 26, 2014. This White Paper offers a report on the makeup of the proposed rule, an impact analysis, and a critical review of its shortcomings.
The Proposed Rule
The CMS proposed rule combines a rebasing of the base-level rates for normal episodes, per visit payments for Low Utilization Payment Adjustment (LUPA) episodes, and the add-on payments for Non- Routine Supplies (NRS) along with a recalibration of the case-mix weights assigned to each of the categories within the case-mix adjuster.
This presents a complication in an initial review as it makes the 2014 proposed rates seem much greater than the 2013 rates. However, the recalibration is proposed in a budget neutral manner by reducing each of the case-mix categories by 26.02%. (Alternatively, by dividing the case mix weights by 1.3517 which CMS states is the average weight in early 2012).
The Proposed Rates
The proposed rated for 2014 reflect a 2.4 Market Basket Index adjustment to reflect estimate costs increases in 2014. In addition, these rates reflect a rebasing adjustment of -3.5% for episodes, +3.5% for per visit LUPA rates, and -2.58% for Non-Routine Supplies.
Impact of Proposed 2014 HHPPS Rates
CMS estimates that the overall impact of the proposed rate rebasing and other rate changes is a reduction in Medicare spending of $290 million in 2014. That represents a decrease of approximately 1.5% in comparison to estimated 2013 payments.
The impact analysis performed by NAHC demonstrates that the continued delivery of home health services throughout the country is at high risk if the proposed rule is finalized. NAHC estimates that by 2017, 72.29% of all HHAs will be paid less than the cost of care and that the average Medicare margin will be -9.77%.
This estimate come by way of reviewing over 8,200 FYE 2011 cost reports from all types of HHAs from all over the country. In Alaska (91.7%), Hawaii (100%), New York (89.9%) and Oregon (87.2%) in can be expected that the entire home health infrastructure is at risk of crumbling to nothing. That is certain to lead to an access to care crisis and increased Medicare spending as patients seek care in the only viable option remaining: high cost care settings.
Rate rebasing is not a simple task for CMS. It has serious consequences to Medicare, providers of care and the patients served. As such, it must be performed carefully and correctly.
The CMS proposal fails on numerous counts, but most notably in the absence of any consideration as to its impact on access to care. The proposal should be abandoned and replaced with one that puts care access first, considers all methods of calculating rates, recognizes all of the current costs of care, and includes an appropriate margin to secure operating capital and a fair return on investment to allow for continued modernization of home health care for today’s health care delivery innovations.
The full text of the white paper is available here.